Family Delinquency Essay

There atomic number 18 several(prenominal) factors that might lead to feckless resurrecting in single p arent households. Among these factors are the available economic and paternal resources to peasantren and the stressful conditions that characterize much(prenominal) families. studyity of single parents are economic all in ally disadvantaged. As such, they a good deal want the genuine resources that they can offer their children.The result is that their children remain uncompetitive especially in school. Their children thus lack status among their peers owing to the inability of the parent to abide things that they may need. Due to the fact that majority of single parents suffer from variant economic difficulties, they are likely to live in run down feather neighborhoods characterized by high crime rates, low quality schools and few society services.The majority of single parents in any case find it difficult to hightail it in effect as parents. They are in most cas es less emotionally supporting of their children, are less restrictive, dispense harsher discipline, are more inconsistent in dispensing discipline, offer less supervision and engage in more struggle with their children (Simmons and Simmons, 2005).These deficits in parenting emanate from the struggle to provide for the family with limited financial resources and attempting to give the axe children in the absence of the other biologic parent. Various studies associate inept parenting by resident single parents with a variety of negative progenys among children. descent in the midst of in carcassal and formal labeling to adolescent delinquencyAccording to labeling theory, dig negative reactions result in the ontogenesis of negative egotism conceptions and great woebegone involvement (Glueck, 1962). The prop iodinnts of this theory emphasize on the importance of some(prenominal) formal and informal labeling. Formal labels are those acquired by factor of partake with frie ndly control agencies while informal labeling are those that parents, peers and teachers generate. Juveniles be follow stigmatized through contact with mixer control agencies. Involvement in delinquent behavior is one of the possible responses to creation negatively labeled or stigmatized. Negative parental reactions may also lead to a juvenile change state delinquent.In their routine activities, juveniles encounter different cues and clues on how members of the community they live perceive them. Juveniles can interpret accurately the meaning of symbols and gestures employed to project labels upon them through theatrical role taking and delimit situations. Human beings cannot be said to be passive receptors of negative labels since they shed got the power to take part in cooperative interaction through significant symbols. Some juveniles negotiate labels and at judgment of convictions attempt to repudiate their deviant imputations (Simmons and Simmons, 2005).Naming or defin ing something is never an idealistic procedure but rather a consequence of an action. As such, social groups establish deviance by their response to cognise acts. A label at that placefore designates something that is a consequence of successful colloquy of gestures. It is this successful conversation of gestures that makes the edge of labeling the self possible.Labeling theorists assume that individuals project themselves into the role of significant others during real or imagined interactions and make assessments or self appraisals. The self aims an object for which the person attaches labels which can either be positive or negative. This assumption is guided by the conception that human have the capacity to choose among competing labels for their self conception.Discuss the factors relating to the possibilities of the family structure being a major contribution to a juvenile becoming complex in delinquent behaviors.Family structure influences to a large extent the behavior of children. Research findings forecast that children growing up with single parents have an increased pretend of becoming delinquents (Glueck, 1962). The structure of the family influences economic and parental resources that are available to children. Single parents, being financially constrained, are less likely to take care of their childrens need. The result is that the children experience low self esteem as they lack the majority of things that other children possess. Children who are growing up in a family where some(prenominal) parents are present are unlikely to experience behavioral problems.Research also indicates that children from single parent families that receive support from non-resident fathers also exhibit fewer behavioral problems than those without support. With this regard, economic factors influence the possibilities of a child becoming deviant and this mainly depends on the structure of the family. If both the parents are present, the economic conditions are likely to be better as both parents may take the responsibility in providing for the children. As such, the children may not feel deprived thereby reducing the possibilities of becoming deviant.Children become conformists when their parents possess cooperative co-parental relationship. When parents support each others finalitys and agree on the rules of the family, the children learn that the parents authority is not arbitrary. Parental agreement therefore means that the children are not exposed to inconsistent discipline when they misbehave. This consistency amid parents encourages children to learn and internalize moral set and social norms.Causes of marital military groupSocial theories see marital violence to be the product of the society. As such, they see marital violence as emanating from the social structures and the cultural values and norms that accommodate the use of violence among partners. Furthermore, the causes of marital violence have been arrogated by some sociologists to be rooted in the structure of the family the interaction between the members of the family and their social interactions. For instance, family systems theory relates the cause of marital violence to communication flaws and conflict in intimate relationships.Psychological theories on the other hand attribute the causes to individual experiences and predispositions. Marital violence may be linked to biological inclination to violence and personality dis do, or as suggested by social learning theories, to the offenders social environment during his early stages of development. bond theory emphasizes on the relationship between parents or caregivers with their children and the consequences of such attachments on the ability of an individual to develop safe and healthy relationships ulterior in life. Psychological perspectives hold that individuals may be predisposed to violence by personality disorders or early experiences of trauma. As such, being abusive physically i s seen as a manifestation of an underlying emotional problem. Childhood experiences such as parental abuse, rejection and the inability to satisfy the dependence needs of a child may provide a source of later violence. three-fold JeopardyStatistics show that women are at a higher risk of being victims of marital violence than males. Quite a number of reasons have been postulated to explain this phenomenon. Among the wide held theories is that women are inherently weak. With regard to physical strength, it is widely known that males far much out-weigh females in strength.Many female victims often find themselves in difficult situation when they are taking the decision to report their partner for abusing them physically. This is because they are likely to do something worse when they come out. As such, female victims of marital violence are always at the risk of double jeopardy. Even though violation of protection order may lead to federal criminal prosecution, advocates may develop p rocedures to keep off double jeopardy. state heterogeneity theoryThese theories postulate that there is an sign proneness to commit violent offenses and that this early difference in the development of an individual remains quite stable oer time (Glueck, 1962)). masses with numerous risk factors before birth, during toddler hood and during childhood are more likely to develop violent tendencies during adolescence and adulthood. In other words, there is a correlation between past and current criminal behavior. Population heterogeneity process attributes stability in offending over time to differences in anti-social characteristics across individuals that is established early in life.One of the implications of a population heterogeneity explanation for continuity in crime over time is that the antisocial feature is likely to have reverberations throughout life, adopting some(prenominal) manifestations later in life. Any observed correspondence between later life events and crimina lity is spurious due to the fact that they are all the consequence of a common cause.Concepts and rulers of social learning theoryThe radical assumption of social learning theory is that the same learning process that operates within the context of social structure, interaction and situation produces both conformist and deviant behavior. The direction of the process in which these mechanisms operate is the basis of their difference. What is involved is the balance of influences on behavior.In most cases, that balance exudes some form of stability over time but it can also become unstable and change with circumstances and time. Conformity and deviant behavior is wise to(p) by the mechanisms in this process even though the theory proposes that the principle mechanism are part of the process in which differential reward and imitation produce both overt behavior and cognitive definitions that function as discriminative stimuli for the behavior.Parenting skillsThe success of any fami ly is dependent upon effective parenting. As such, it is important for every parent to establish healthy methods of raising their children. current parents should know that the future of their children lie in their hands. The first step to parenting is exploitation clear expectations of what both parents want. Depending on the background of what is being considered right or wrong, parents should plan and fall their expectation to each other.Establishing a list of social, academic, spiritual and family oriented expectations for different mounts and activities will enable parents to be very particular(prenominal) and concrete in teaching their children. They must however take into stipulation the ability and age of the child, developmental status and the available resources. After setting the appropriate rules and expectations, the second most important thing is to unambiguously communicate these expectations in word and in deed.ReferencesGlueck, E. (1962). Family environment a nd delinquency. Houghton MifflinSimmons, R. & Simmons L. (2005). Families, delinquency, and crime Linking Societys Most Basic Institution to Antisocial Behavior. Oxford University Press