Analysis of the Book of the Dun Cow

In Walter Wangerin Jr. s beast fable, The phonograph recording of the Dun Cow, two roosters have the unusual distinction of being Lords of their decl atomic number 18 manor. Webster defines a Lord as a person having great powers and authority, a pattern or master, where as a manor is defined as the district either over which a lord holds authority and domain (Webster). Chauntecleer is introduced to the contributor as the draw or Lord of the henhouse and the ruler over the tools in the surrounding get down. On the other hand, Cockatrice takes over as leader of his Coop and res publicaed estate after he kills his father, Senex.Chauntecleer and Cockatrice ar two actually different roosters who lead and rule their domain in stark personal credit line yet they be some(prenominal) labeled as Lords of the manor. Early on in the novel, Chauntecleer is portrayed as a short tempered, vain, and arrogant ruler who is not at all likeable. While he is proud and doubtless stubborn, he is also characterized as fair, compassionate, and just. With his noble bearing, Chauntecleer keeps a sense of allege in his land and the animals lives by crowing the bedonic hours and occasional crows in his gruelling magnificent voice. His crows are compared to the clock of the community. S stock-still quantifys a day, dutifully, with a deep sense of their importance, and by the immemorial command of the Divine, Chauntecleer crowed his canonical crows (page 12). Crowing is his job and when he leads by his crows, the hens in his coop and the animals in his land are happy and unafraid, he is even able to birth wrong things right. While Chauntecleer may be flawed as a leader, his harem of hens and other creatures like John, Wesley Weasel, and Mundo Cani Dog see him as their shielder and ruler. He protects the lives of those around him and sees that justice is carried out.As Lord he supports and protects his land and unites all his creatures whether fowl, rodent, or insect a nimals large or small, wild or domestic to come join together to fight evil. East and upstream from Chauntecleers land is another land ruled by another Lord, Cockatrice. A half rooster half serpent conceived as a government issue of an unnatural union of his rooster father, Senex, and the evil serpent Wyrm. Cockatrice rules his manor with threats and fear. unlike his father, Senex, who always remembered the canonical crows to help unite his animals, Cockatrice never crows the canon. So chthonic him the day lost its meaning and its direction, and the animals lost any sense of time or purpose They were tired all the day long, and at night they did not sleep (page 82). Under his evil rule, the creatures suffer from disunity, distrust, and dishonor. Cockatrice shows no furbish up for the animals of his land and resorts to having the Toad speak for him. He humiliates the animals and is an enemy to the creatures rather than a Lord. He rapes the hens and forces them to bear his childr en and suffer a cruel indignity.He swallows up thousands of children that hatch as Basilisk creatures and then vomits them back into the river. Rather than protect the creatures of his land, he orders his Basilisk children to kill everyone living until only he sits silently in his tree. Cockatrice leaves his land and flies west for he has no creatures to lord. By comparison, both Chauntecleer and Cockatrice are dominant roosters that command attention from the creatures in their communities. Likewise they are both offspring of past Lords of the Coop in their realm. Animals and creatures in their land and Coop hold a degree of fear of them.While both are able to gather their subjects together, the outcomes from these gatherings are fatally different. In contrast, the two Lords are as different as good and evil. While Chauntecleer is a strong postured, slightly scruffy, handsome rooster with noble bearing Cockatrice is frightening and threatening with his serpent bearing tail and bl oody eyes. In return for his leaders and constant abiding, Chauntecleer asks only for good food, loyalty, sleep, a little color in his life, and a morning sunbath. On the other hand, Cockatrice demands total subservience from his creatures even though he shows them no respect or care.Chauntecleer rejoices and shares the pride of his tether sons with his wife, Pertelote, with the creatures of the community while Cockatrice demands he have thousands of children by raping the hens to build an soldiers of Basilisks who just by their touch cause death. As Lord of his land, Chauntecleer calls for all the creatures in his land to gather for a council so that he can prepare them for the upcoming battles with evil. In contrast, Cockatrice forbids the animals from gathering for meetings and even mere talking. Chauntecleer argues against revenge and hatred while Cockatrice is driven by this very evil.In Wangerins novel, both Chauntecleer and Cockatrice have the gift of speech however they e ach individually use up their own path of good or evil, order or chaos, and finally life or death. Not only do all of the animal creatures from Cockatrices land perish, he too dies because of his self destructive hatred. In the land of Chauntecleer, the creatures mourn the loss of their fellow animals killed in battle however they look to their Lord of the manor to rebuild their land so they can cause their overall purpose to be the last protection against the almighty evil, Wyrm.