STAR INVESTIGATION :: essays research papers

Format Internet Journalism and the Starr investigating     The Starr Investigation was an important time in journalism, because it forced the traditional media to overhaul their slipway of presenting news online in order to meet the needs and demands of Internet users. tender technology was used in this case to break the news of the scandal, to percentage new allegations, and to release in its entirety Starrs final enshroud of the investigation. This case provided the first detailed look at the differences in acknowledgment between the Internet and traditional broadcast and print media.The ethical issues in Internet Journalism and the Starr Investigation1. Was this a legitimate news romance?2. Intense journalistic competition? Journalists of all stripes were chasing the novel.3. CREDIBILITY of the write up? Reporting Facts that in the end proved false.Editors doubtful of the storys accuracy? The reliability of the information?4. The Value of Verification to get the story right?5. Anonymous Sourcing/ Unidentified Sources - Journalists scrambled to confirm the allegations, but practically ended up running them with only anonymous sourcing.6. Speed, sensation and reckon over accuracy? CNNs Scott Woelfel says he sensed in the early termination that, "there was an attitude of, I dont know if we could assign this in the paper, but we could put it on the Web site." 7.News Leakage? Certain sources in the independent advocators office were using the press, selectively leaking information to gain tactical advantage with reluctant witnesses like Lewinsky. McManus recalls. So there was clearly a lot of leakage.8. The breaking of the story. Matt Drudge breaking the story by his online newsletter? - Wire services sent the story worldwide. Cable networks, radio shows, and local television newscasts led with the report. Larry King interrupted his program to guide the story live.9. The story was so explosive that Bill Clintons atto rney called Nightline and DENIED the story on the air.10. SHAKY SOURCING? Reports were based around shaky sourcing.- The Dallas cockcrow News and the Wall Street Journal reported that the president and the medical intern had been seen together in a compromising situation.- Starrs staff share called the source to take back the claim because it was FALSE.- Langer told the employees that the News had unwittingly relied on only one source to publish its original story.11. Timing and public interest 12. Violating the papers two-source standard.13. Miscommunication - Senior editors mistakenly believed that a guerrilla source existed because of a miscommunication between Dallas and the Washington bureau.